<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft, Symbian in Palm&#8217;s future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/</link>
	<description>Business, Internet, Technology &#38; Strategy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Koslosky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Koslosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3845</guid>
		<description>And what if Dell licenses Cobalt for its Axim line?

This is a major victory for palmOne, especially in its competition with BlackBerry (excellent article in B2.0 BTW).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what if Dell licenses Cobalt for its Axim line?</p>
<p>This is a major victory for palmOne, especially in its competition with BlackBerry (excellent article in B2.0 BTW).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Maier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Maier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>Dell has never ruled out a Palm OS device, though they're always coy about it. It seems unlikely that they would go with Palm though, their PocketPC devices have been solid and they offer better Wi-Fi support, something PalmSource has been slow to incorporate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell has never ruled out a Palm OS device, though they&#8217;re always coy about it. It seems unlikely that they would go with Palm though, their PocketPC devices have been solid and they offer better Wi-Fi support, something PalmSource has been slow to incorporate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>ckm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>I doubt it.  Having spoken to a lot of people at Nokia, I know that Nokia percieves that one of the key barriers to  PDA-like functionality on Symbian is the extreme difficulty of developing applications for Symbian....

Since a key strength of the Palm platform is the ability to quickly develop new apps (and thus fostering a larger amount of 3rd party apps), it's doubtfull that Palm would be so stupid as to adopt Symbian.   Symbian may be more geared to cell phones today, but that does not make it better for what cell phone will be in 18 months, neven mind the stability issues with some Symbian versions....

More likely, Nokia and Palm will collaborate to make mobile connectivity a more real reality, esp. with PDA's.

Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it.  Having spoken to a lot of people at Nokia, I know that Nokia percieves that one of the key barriers to  PDA-like functionality on Symbian is the extreme difficulty of developing applications for Symbian&#8230;.</p>
<p>Since a key strength of the Palm platform is the ability to quickly develop new apps (and thus fostering a larger amount of 3rd party apps), it&#8217;s doubtfull that Palm would be so stupid as to adopt Symbian.   Symbian may be more geared to cell phones today, but that does not make it better for what cell phone will be in 18 months, neven mind the stability issues with some Symbian versions&#8230;.</p>
<p>More likely, Nokia and Palm will collaborate to make mobile connectivity a more real reality, esp. with PDA&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lockergnome's Hardware Help</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockergnome's Hardware Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft, Symbian in Palm's future?&lt;/strong&gt;

Palm has faced a number of challenges this year. And figuring out what their next move is anyones guess. With the news that Microsoft's ActiveSync will be implemented in future Palm devices, this could mean that Palm is not dead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft, Symbian in Palm&#8217;s future?</strong></p>
<p>Palm has faced a number of challenges this year. And figuring out what their next move is anyones guess. With the news that Microsoft&#8217;s ActiveSync will be implemented in future Palm devices, this could mean that Palm is not dead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobile.uberbin.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3849</link>
		<dc:creator>mobile.uberbin.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/05/microsoft-symbian-in-palms-future/#comment-3849</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Alianzas: Treo con Exchange&lt;/strong&gt;

Una de las principales debilidades para que la treo600 pueda ingresar, con mˆ°s fuerza que hoy en dia, al mercado corporativo era su falta total de integraciˆ„n con Exchange (servers de correo de Microsoft). Esto hasta ahora se hacˆ‚a via...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Alianzas: Treo con Exchange</strong></p>
<p>Una de las principales debilidades para que la treo600 pueda ingresar, con mˆ°s fuerza que hoy en dia, al mercado corporativo era su falta total de integraciˆ„n con Exchange (servers de correo de Microsoft). Esto hasta ahora se hacˆ‚a via&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
