<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carriers Versus Handset Makers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/09/10/carriers-versus-handset-makers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/09/10/carriers-versus-handset-makers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venki Iyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/09/10/carriers-versus-handset-makers/#comment-97996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venki Iyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/09/10/carriers-versus-handset-makers/#comment-97996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude,

Can I have some of what you are smoking?

Serously, the OMA stuff, along with DVB-X (or whatever it is called these days) just provides a *STANDARD* mechanism/interface/API (take your pick) for content delivery to any manufacturers handset. Will manufacturers actually try to set up the direct business relationships w/ content providers? I don&#039;t think so. Will moto or nokia or ericsson or samsung, for all of their handset biz, jeopardize their fairly lucrative RAN and CORE infrastructure businesses? NOT!

I agree with you about the long-term (10 years from now) though. Cable/DSL/mobile operators will turn into bit-pipe providers, and consumers will be able to get content/applications directly from providers.  With voice being just another such app.

What does this long-term shift do for content? I think it finally makes them king, for all of a few days - if you think viewership is fragmented now, just wait for 10 years from now. You might actually be making money off your blog. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude,</p>
<p>Can I have some of what you are smoking?</p>
<p>Serously, the OMA stuff, along with DVB-X (or whatever it is called these days) just provides a *STANDARD* mechanism/interface/API (take your pick) for content delivery to any manufacturers handset. Will manufacturers actually try to set up the direct business relationships w/ content providers? I don&#8217;t think so. Will moto or nokia or ericsson or samsung, for all of their handset biz, jeopardize their fairly lucrative RAN and CORE infrastructure businesses? NOT!</p>
<p>I agree with you about the long-term (10 years from now) though. Cable/DSL/mobile operators will turn into bit-pipe providers, and consumers will be able to get content/applications directly from providers.  With voice being just another such app.</p>
<p>What does this long-term shift do for content? I think it finally makes them king, for all of a few days &#8211; if you think viewership is fragmented now, just wait for 10 years from now. You might actually be making money off your blog. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

