<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enron Broadbandits trial delayed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/09/02/enron-broadbandits-trial-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/09/02/enron-broadbandits-trial-delayed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Sierra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/09/02/enron-broadbandits-trial-delayed/#comment-97944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Sierra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/09/02/enron-broadbandits-trial-delayed/#comment-97944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om, Om, Om...

I&#039;m sooo disappointed that you (of all people!!!) failed to acknowledge the article in today&#039;s WSJ about Steven Cooper (sp?), the new Enron CRO, who is asking the BK court to award him/company an additional $25m fee. This additional &#039;hardship&#039; fee (psst, man where can I get a hardship of $25m?) is on top of his regular monthly fee and the already agreed to success fee of ~$65m.

Whoever knew that being a corporate undertaker was so lucrative?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, Om, Om&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sooo disappointed that you (of all people!!!) failed to acknowledge the article in today&#8217;s WSJ about Steven Cooper (sp?), the new Enron CRO, who is asking the BK court to award him/company an additional $25m fee. This additional &#8216;hardship&#8217; fee (psst, man where can I get a hardship of $25m?) is on top of his regular monthly fee and the already agreed to success fee of ~$65m.</p>
<p>Whoever knew that being a corporate undertaker was so lucrative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

