<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Data Boom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fours</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fours]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;http://300bowling.com/bbs/messages/270477.html currentmontgomerypause&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://300bowling.com/bbs/messages/270477.html" rel="nofollow">http://300bowling.com/bbs/messages/270477.html</a> currentmontgomerypause</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Henshall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Henshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like the usual tipsy extrapolations.  I can&#039;t work out your point of view.  Are these numbers logical or space cadet territory.  I tend to look at them and ask &quot;How could they be wrong?&quot; I&#039;m inclined to think this part of the future is not very well thought out.

Then there are other issues.  At Real I can now get a song track for .50 that&#039;s cheaper than the $1 for most ring tones.

Where they are wrong are the big opportunities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like the usual tipsy extrapolations.  I can&#8217;t work out your point of view.  Are these numbers logical or space cadet territory.  I tend to look at them and ask &#8220;How could they be wrong?&#8221; I&#8217;m inclined to think this part of the future is not very well thought out.</p>
<p>Then there are other issues.  At Real I can now get a song track for .50 that&#8217;s cheaper than the $1 for most ring tones.</p>
<p>Where they are wrong are the big opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good point stuart. i see these numbers and look at the logic behind them - it is at least not a hockey stick chart. i am bit mixed on this data. but given strategy analytics track record, i am going to give them the benefit of the doubt, and not fly of the handle ... yet. i clearly think that ringtones are a much simpler and easier market to cash in on for record companies. i think that is a big market. unfortunately real did not think in those terms and missed the opportunity. actually so did microsoft, apple and everyone else in the US. ringtones is a Euro Asian phenom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point stuart. i see these numbers and look at the logic behind them &#8211; it is at least not a hockey stick chart. i am bit mixed on this data. but given strategy analytics track record, i am going to give them the benefit of the doubt, and not fly of the handle &#8230; yet. i clearly think that ringtones are a much simpler and easier market to cash in on for record companies. i think that is a big market. unfortunately real did not think in those terms and missed the opportunity. actually so did microsoft, apple and everyone else in the US. ringtones is a Euro Asian phenom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Batchelor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Batchelor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/08/17/mobile-data-boom/#comment-97827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how much if any of the forecast built in the China story? See ChinaPrivateEquity for a note post on the fallout from falling SMS revenues in China.

I also read in the print version of Wired Magazine recently a short piece on the previously forecasted trends for online users, online shopping and the like. Key point: the forecasts were mostly trending as predicted but with a lag or a year or so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much if any of the forecast built in the China story? See ChinaPrivateEquity for a note post on the fallout from falling SMS revenues in China.</p>
<p>I also read in the print version of Wired Magazine recently a short piece on the previously forecasted trends for online users, online shopping and the like. Key point: the forecasts were mostly trending as predicted but with a lag or a year or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

