<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to get ZyXEL working with Vonage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you just give out your 10 digit password?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you just give out your 10 digit password?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah - that is a made-up#. Even I know that sometimes it is not a good idea to put one&#039;s number online! He he :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah &#8211; that is a made-up#. Even I know that sometimes it is not a good idea to put one&#8217;s number online! He he :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Abramson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Abramson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om,

So everyone who reads you (and me) the issue was not getting the Vonage account set up. It was pulling a DHCP set up.

Seems the problem is related to chipsets and the lack of compatability. I *THINK* and am awaiting a call from Zyxel&#039;s lead in support that the issue is how it deals with MIXED 802.11b/g signals with the Microsoft wireless gateway.

Andy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>So everyone who reads you (and me) the issue was not getting the Vonage account set up. It was pulling a DHCP set up.</p>
<p>Seems the problem is related to chipsets and the lack of compatability. I *THINK* and am awaiting a call from Zyxel&#8217;s lead in support that the issue is how it deals with MIXED 802.11b/g signals with the Microsoft wireless gateway.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Sierra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Sierra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/07/26/how-to-get-zyxel-working-with-vonage/#comment-97624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy,

I&#039;m wondering if you ever saw the piece over at Tom&#039;s Hardware (maybe 2 months ago?) which specifically reviewed tons on 802.11 equipment and found that much of the equipment fails to work as advertised, ie at the &quot;so-called&quot; standard rates.

Mostly when the devices worked, they often were only operating at 1 or 2Mbps, not 11 or 55, etc.

Lastly, since wireless, just like ethernet, is a &quot;shared&quot; resource, this means that all it takes is one crappy device to downgrade the experience of everybody.

PS. I&#039;m so ready for UWB!!!
More bandwidth, less power!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if you ever saw the piece over at Tom&#8217;s Hardware (maybe 2 months ago?) which specifically reviewed tons on 802.11 equipment and found that much of the equipment fails to work as advertised, ie at the &#8220;so-called&#8221; standard rates.</p>
<p>Mostly when the devices worked, they often were only operating at 1 or 2Mbps, not 11 or 55, etc.</p>
<p>Lastly, since wireless, just like ethernet, is a &#8220;shared&#8221; resource, this means that all it takes is one crappy device to downgrade the experience of everybody.</p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;m so ready for UWB!!!<br />
More bandwidth, less power!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

