<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crisis inside Chipzilla?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Permanent4</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Permanent4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe Intel&#039;s focus is shifting more to WiFi and WiMAX chips as the CPU market slowly shifts toward commodity?  Just a thought.  Nobody gets excited about GHz except gamers anymore, and the consoles are starting to market to them with network gaming...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Intel&#8217;s focus is shifting more to WiFi and WiMAX chips as the CPU market slowly shifts toward commodity?  Just a thought.  Nobody gets excited about GHz except gamers anymore, and the consoles are starting to market to them with network gaming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that might be so, but Intel&#039;s revenue stream from WiFi is miniscule and they are not really kicking butt there. WiMAX, as I see it is nothing more than &quot;slideware&quot; right now. where is the silicon. I think this company is not focusing on the very basics - the processors which throw up billions for it to experiment with other crap. anyway that&#039;s my take.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that might be so, but Intel&#8217;s revenue stream from WiFi is miniscule and they are not really kicking butt there. WiMAX, as I see it is nothing more than &#8220;slideware&#8221; right now. where is the silicon. I think this company is not focusing on the very basics &#8211; the processors which throw up billions for it to experiment with other crap. anyway that&#8217;s my take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeLikeIt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeLikeIt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/05/13/crisis-inside-chipzilla/#comment-97035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is true -- this &quot;roadmap adjustment&quot; is huge.  Intel processors usually take 18 months for &quot;moderate&quot; change iterations to materialize.  (cache bump, FSB bump, etc.)  That is, all the previous generations have validated the architectural viability &amp; are getting &quot;tweaks&quot;.  To pull in the schedule of dual core chips by 1 year is H-U-G-E.  Even assuming that large-scale changes like this were assumed to take 4 years of development, that&#039;s a 25% pull-in.  That&#039;s not trivial.

And Yes, Fister&#039;s head rolled.  Intel execs as a whole don&#039;t leave the company unless there&#039;s a very good reason.  Someone of Fister&#039;s stature gets offers all the time, but leaving Intel?  That&#039;s only done when they hit a glass ceiling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true &#8212; this &#8220;roadmap adjustment&#8221; is huge.  Intel processors usually take 18 months for &#8220;moderate&#8221; change iterations to materialize.  (cache bump, FSB bump, etc.)  That is, all the previous generations have validated the architectural viability &#038; are getting &#8220;tweaks&#8221;.  To pull in the schedule of dual core chips by 1 year is H-U-G-E.  Even assuming that large-scale changes like this were assumed to take 4 years of development, that&#8217;s a 25% pull-in.  That&#8217;s not trivial.</p>
<p>And Yes, Fister&#8217;s head rolled.  Intel execs as a whole don&#8217;t leave the company unless there&#8217;s a very good reason.  Someone of Fister&#8217;s stature gets offers all the time, but leaving Intel?  That&#8217;s only done when they hit a glass ceiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
