<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype bounty signals bubble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebloggs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joebloggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who knows what kind of business it will be, but I think you&#039;re too pessimistic. Hotmail today would surely be profitable today even with 95% of users stuck on the &quot;free&quot; email plan and 5% paying for a premium plan.

Skype, with its P2P architecture, is even more cost effective than Hotmail. It will take only a tiny percentage of its users paying up for some premium services for it to become highly profitable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows what kind of business it will be, but I think you&#8217;re too pessimistic. Hotmail today would surely be profitable today even with 95% of users stuck on the &#8220;free&#8221; email plan and 5% paying for a premium plan.</p>
<p>Skype, with its P2P architecture, is even more cost effective than Hotmail. It will take only a tiny percentage of its users paying up for some premium services for it to become highly profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Skype will be no different.&quot;

Unless it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Skype will be no different.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Rafer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Om, you&#039;ve been a journalist too long. Excess cynicism seems to be clouding your thinking.

You answered your own question. If no profitable, independent business model becomes apparent for Skype, Draper will sell it off to someone who can make money with it -- just like Draper did with Hotmail. Do you think that Microsoft regrets buying Hotmail? Absolutely not. It is the only way that they have been able to do any sort of decent customer acquisition for MSN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Om, you&#8217;ve been a journalist too long. Excess cynicism seems to be clouding your thinking.</p>
<p>You answered your own question. If no profitable, independent business model becomes apparent for Skype, Draper will sell it off to someone who can make money with it &#8212; just like Draper did with Hotmail. Do you think that Microsoft regrets buying Hotmail? Absolutely not. It is the only way that they have been able to do any sort of decent customer acquisition for MSN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Masnick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha!  We both thought the exact same thing:

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040315/0937214_F.shtml

However, I&#039;m going to point out that whether or not Skype has a business model is really only an issue for the folks at DFJ and others who put their money towards it.  From the consumer side, we should end up with better VoIP offerings, as money flows into this space... That seems like a good thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  We both thought the exact same thing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040315/0937214_F.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040315/0937214_F.shtml</a></p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m going to point out that whether or not Skype has a business model is really only an issue for the folks at DFJ and others who put their money towards it.  From the consumer side, we should end up with better VoIP offerings, as money flows into this space&#8230; That seems like a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DonÌt forget about the mobile opportunities. Skype doesnÌt appear to have a PocketPC version, but they most likely will and as Wi-Fi becomes more pervasive we should see VoIP offerings flourish.

Kevin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DonÌt forget about the mobile opportunities. Skype doesnÌt appear to have a PocketPC version, but they most likely will and as Wi-Fi becomes more pervasive we should see VoIP offerings flourish.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Galt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Galt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The business model is simple:  Sell peopel a premium program.

You can charge $20-$50 for software.  Since skype doesn&#039;t need to operate an infrastructure, they should be able to make good money.

I just can&#039;t figure out why they would need $18M though, unless they plan to start a massive advertising blitz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The business model is simple:  Sell peopel a premium program.</p>
<p>You can charge $20-$50 for software.  Since skype doesn&#8217;t need to operate an infrastructure, they should be able to make good money.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t figure out why they would need $18M though, unless they plan to start a massive advertising blitz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hansen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Hansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps an AOL type - cd give-away blitz in the works?  If Skype is partnering with a &quot;major European home phone manufacturer&quot; as outlined
http://news.com.com/2100-7352_3-5173238.html

I could see a Skype CD version 1.0 included with everyone phone sold in every store - royalty revenue, 3 months enhanced voicemail service included with the phone purchase , free calls to your loved ones anywhere in the world etc.... the demand would be impossible to fill - talk about viral marketing..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps an AOL type &#8211; cd give-away blitz in the works?  If Skype is partnering with a &#8220;major European home phone manufacturer&#8221; as outlined<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/2100-7352_3-5173238.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/2100-7352_3-5173238.html</a></p>
<p>I could see a Skype CD version 1.0 included with everyone phone sold in every store &#8211; royalty revenue, 3 months enhanced voicemail service included with the phone purchase , free calls to your loved ones anywhere in the world etc&#8230;. the demand would be impossible to fill &#8211; talk about viral marketing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dano</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are very wrong about Hotmail. As a free-standing company they would be printing money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very wrong about Hotmail. As a free-standing company they would be printing money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbound Spiral</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unbound Spiral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype Xfire Presence&lt;/strong&gt;

Skype is again in the news with $18.8 million in second round financing with Draper Fisher Jurvetson and European Index Ventures. Om Malik weighs in and asks where&#039;s the business model. To which we should look more closely at both...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype Xfire Presence</strong></p>
<p>Skype is again in the news with $18.8 million in second round financing with Draper Fisher Jurvetson and European Index Ventures. Om Malik weighs in and asks where&#8217;s the business model. To which we should look more closely at both&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on VoIP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik on VoIP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype Hype Take II&lt;/strong&gt;

I had published a tiny piece yesterday on the potential lack of business model at Skype, which recently raised about $18.8 million from various venture capitalists. Stuart Henshall has an interesting response where he explains the business model and ex...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype Hype Take II</strong></p>
<p>I had published a tiny piece yesterday on the potential lack of business model at Skype, which recently raised about $18.8 million from various venture capitalists. Stuart Henshall has an interesting response where he explains the business model and ex&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Tracey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Tracey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Bursting the Skype Bubble&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For past few weeks there has been a lot of noise around Skype. What with company raising millions in venture ...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bursting the Skype Bubble</strong></p>
<p>For past few weeks there has been a lot of noise around Skype. What with company raising millions in venture &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/03/15/skype-bounty-signals-bubble/#comment-96575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype is much better&lt;/strong&gt;

Just spent over an hour on a Skype call with Matt this morning. Wow. The first time around, I had several significant complaints about Skype &#8212; I was in the minority at the time, but the sound quality for me...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype is much better</strong></p>
<p>Just spent over an hour on a Skype call with Matt this morning. Wow. The first time around, I had several significant complaints about Skype &#8212; I was in the minority at the time, but the sound quality for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

