<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Strikes Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/#comment-96425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/#comment-96425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s an interesting article at http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=297&amp;c=1 that talks about how Google&#039;s tremendous lead in number of searches has NOT translated into number of users. In fact, according to the article&#039;s cited statistics, it only ranks as the #5 web property with Yahoo and MSN each reaching nearly twice as many users.

Google&#039;s better bet for growth might be the strategy they are already pursuing - syndication of their Adwords program to third party websites, third party e-mails, etc. They can stay focused on their existing markets and scale them rather than getting into an expensive branding war with Yahoo and MSN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting article at <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=297&#038;c=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=297&#038;c=1</a> that talks about how Google&#8217;s tremendous lead in number of searches has NOT translated into number of users. In fact, according to the article&#8217;s cited statistics, it only ranks as the #5 web property with Yahoo and MSN each reaching nearly twice as many users.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s better bet for growth might be the strategy they are already pursuing &#8211; syndication of their Adwords program to third party websites, third party e-mails, etc. They can stay focused on their existing markets and scale them rather than getting into an expensive branding war with Yahoo and MSN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/#comment-96426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/02/18/google-strikes-back/#comment-96426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Google may have mistimed their IPO - between the major portals coming back at them and the traffic cut they must be feeling from losing Yahoo (anyone have any data on this), they&#039;ve missed that &quot;perfect&quot; window.  Now, they&#039;ll only have an awesome IPO which only makes the founders worth 2-3 billion dollars.  Such is life - I feel bad for those guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google may have mistimed their IPO &#8211; between the major portals coming back at them and the traffic cut they must be feeling from losing Yahoo (anyone have any data on this), they&#8217;ve missed that &#8220;perfect&#8221; window.  Now, they&#8217;ll only have an awesome IPO which only makes the founders worth 2-3 billion dollars.  Such is life &#8211; I feel bad for those guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
