<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle of the Music Formats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/02/03/battle-of-the-music-formats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/02/03/battle-of-the-music-formats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamalesh Thakker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/02/03/battle-of-the-music-formats/#comment-96291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamalesh Thakker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/02/03/battle-of-the-music-formats/#comment-96291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The audio file format war being waged today, I find quite interesting.

We&#039;ve seen this before but reversed -- with Microsoft huffing and puffing about why all should bow to their file format (defacto standard, 110% market share of Office and rising, rich user experience, blah, blah, blah...no mention of humungo file sizes and general bloat, alas).

I find the recent commentary about Apple&#039;s iPods not supporting WMA (or Real) format to be insulting.

The dangers of file formats have to do with control and subsequent user choices narrowing.  This is easily done when a monopoly player also happens to own the file format.

In this new case, Apple does not own the AAC (MP4) format, while WMA *is* owned by Microsoft.

What person not on medication and/or suffering from short-term memory loss would insist that iPods support WMA format?   As MP3 slowly is replaced with MP4, wouldn&#039;t this be a perfect juncture for Microsoft to snatch back file format control?

(I never noticed back around 1990, Microsoft volunteering to support WordPerfect files, and Lotus 1-2-3 files back when they were bundling Windows licenses with Office suite sales.)

/kt
L.A., Calif.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The audio file format war being waged today, I find quite interesting.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen this before but reversed &#8212; with Microsoft huffing and puffing about why all should bow to their file format (defacto standard, 110% market share of Office and rising, rich user experience, blah, blah, blah&#8230;no mention of humungo file sizes and general bloat, alas).</p>
<p>I find the recent commentary about Apple&#8217;s iPods not supporting WMA (or Real) format to be insulting.</p>
<p>The dangers of file formats have to do with control and subsequent user choices narrowing.  This is easily done when a monopoly player also happens to own the file format.</p>
<p>In this new case, Apple does not own the AAC (MP4) format, while WMA *is* owned by Microsoft.</p>
<p>What person not on medication and/or suffering from short-term memory loss would insist that iPods support WMA format?   As MP3 slowly is replaced with MP4, wouldn&#8217;t this be a perfect juncture for Microsoft to snatch back file format control?</p>
<p>(I never noticed back around 1990, Microsoft volunteering to support WordPerfect files, and Lotus 1-2-3 files back when they were bundling Windows licenses with Office suite sales.)</p>
<p>/kt<br />
L.A., Calif.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
