<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gadget Magazine bubble?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-876941</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-876941</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work, great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work, great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithran Mathew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithran Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure about the last point, that "unless thin screens come down to $500, mass adoption is not going to happen. "   Ask your parents how much they had to spend for their first television.  Ask yourself how much you spent for your first IBM PC (I spent $5k in 1982) . Just because a new technology is expensive does not mean it will not be adopted.  On the contrary, many of the insiders in the display industry seem to think that at $3k, LCD's are at the right price point both to compete against plasma on the upper end and to push people on the lower end to trade up.  Also, from what I understand, the big LCD makers (Samsung, LG Phillips, Sharp) are making pots of money off of these things.   There is plenty of money in consumer devices at that price-point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about the last point, that &#8220;unless thin screens come down to $500, mass adoption is not going to happen. &#8221;   Ask your parents how much they had to spend for their first television.  Ask yourself how much you spent for your first IBM PC (I spent $5k in 1982) . Just because a new technology is expensive does not mean it will not be adopted.  On the contrary, many of the insiders in the display industry seem to think that at $3k, LCD&#8217;s are at the right price point both to compete against plasma on the upper end and to push people on the lower end to trade up.  Also, from what I understand, the big LCD makers (Samsung, LG Phillips, Sharp) are making pots of money off of these things.   There is plenty of money in consumer devices at that price-point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Little</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Nice roundup, thanks Om.  There are plenty of people out there who like reading about gadgets, but don't have the time/money/inclination to do anything more about them.  Just think of it as porn for the tech masses.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice roundup, thanks Om.  There are plenty of people out there who like reading about gadgets, but don&#8217;t have the time/money/inclination to do anything more about them.  Just think of it as porn for the tech masses.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>the margins for the retailers are razor thin.  They make most of their money on the accessories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the margins for the retailers are razor thin.  They make most of their money on the accessories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Om</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>mr. mathew i take your point and would like to add some comments. well all i can say is that there is a huge difference between what early adopters will spend for a product and what the rest of the world will. i think many in silicon valley make that mistake. this observation is based on the retail data from one of the larger chains in the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. mathew i take your point and would like to add some comments. well all i can say is that there is a huge difference between what early adopters will spend for a product and what the rest of the world will. i think many in silicon valley make that mistake. this observation is based on the retail data from one of the larger chains in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband &#187; Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband &#187; Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>[...] about VoIP &#124; Main &#124;  6/6/2004	  	 Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo 	 	 			Earlier this year I had written this post about the gadget magazine bubble. The reason - there were f [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about VoIP | Main |  6/6/2004	  	 Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo 	 	 			Earlier this year I had written this post about the gadget magazine bubble. The reason - there were f [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anil dash's daily links</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>anil dash's daily links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gadget Magazine bubble?&lt;/strong&gt;

http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/01/gadget_magazine_bubble.html...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gadget Magazine bubble?</strong></p>
<p> (<a href="http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/01/gadget_magazine_bubble.html.." rel="nofollow">link</a>) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIENSTRAUM MediaMondo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>DIENSTRAUM MediaMondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gadget Magazine bubble?&lt;/strong&gt;

Gadget Magazine bubble? (Om Malik)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gadget Magazine bubble?</strong></p>
<p>Gadget Magazine bubble? (Om Malik)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
