<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gadget Magazine bubble?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Reviews</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget Reviews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep up the good work, great article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work, great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithran Mathew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mithran Mathew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not so sure about the last point, that &quot;unless thin screens come down to $500, mass adoption is not going to happen. &quot;   Ask your parents how much they had to spend for their first television.  Ask yourself how much you spent for your first IBM PC (I spent $5k in 1982) . Just because a new technology is expensive does not mean it will not be adopted.  On the contrary, many of the insiders in the display industry seem to think that at $3k, LCD&#039;s are at the right price point both to compete against plasma on the upper end and to push people on the lower end to trade up.  Also, from what I understand, the big LCD makers (Samsung, LG Phillips, Sharp) are making pots of money off of these things.   There is plenty of money in consumer devices at that price-point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about the last point, that &#8220;unless thin screens come down to $500, mass adoption is not going to happen. &#8221;   Ask your parents how much they had to spend for their first television.  Ask yourself how much you spent for your first IBM PC (I spent $5k in 1982) . Just because a new technology is expensive does not mean it will not be adopted.  On the contrary, many of the insiders in the display industry seem to think that at $3k, LCD&#8217;s are at the right price point both to compete against plasma on the upper end and to push people on the lower end to trade up.  Also, from what I understand, the big LCD makers (Samsung, LG Phillips, Sharp) are making pots of money off of these things.   There is plenty of money in consumer devices at that price-point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Little</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Little]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice roundup, thanks Om.  There are plenty of people out there who like reading about gadgets, but don&#039;t have the time/money/inclination to do anything more about them.  Just think of it as porn for the tech masses.  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice roundup, thanks Om.  There are plenty of people out there who like reading about gadgets, but don&#8217;t have the time/money/inclination to do anything more about them.  Just think of it as porn for the tech masses.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the margins for the retailers are razor thin.  They make most of their money on the accessories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the margins for the retailers are razor thin.  They make most of their money on the accessories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mr. mathew i take your point and would like to add some comments. well all i can say is that there is a huge difference between what early adopters will spend for a product and what the rest of the world will. i think many in silicon valley make that mistake. this observation is based on the retail data from one of the larger chains in the country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mr. mathew i take your point and would like to add some comments. well all i can say is that there is a huge difference between what early adopters will spend for a product and what the rest of the world will. i think many in silicon valley make that mistake. this observation is based on the retail data from one of the larger chains in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband &#187; Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik on Broadband &#187; Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about VoIP &#124; Main &#124;  6/6/2004	  	 Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo 	 	 			Earlier this year I had written this post about the gadget magazine bubble. The reason - there were f [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about VoIP | Main |  6/6/2004	  	 Gadget magazine bubble, TakeTwo 	 	 			Earlier this year I had written this post about the gadget magazine bubble. The reason &#8211; there were f [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anil dash's daily links</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anil dash's daily links]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gadget Magazine bubble?&lt;/strong&gt;

http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/01/gadget_magazine_bubble.html...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gadget Magazine bubble?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/01/gadget_magazine_bubble.html" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/archives/2004/01/gadget_magazine_bubble.html</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIENSTRAUM MediaMondo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DIENSTRAUM MediaMondo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/01/27/gadget-magazine-bubble/#comment-96191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gadget Magazine bubble?&lt;/strong&gt;

Gadget Magazine bubble? (Om Malik)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gadget Magazine bubble?</strong></p>
<p>Gadget Magazine bubble? (Om Malik)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
