<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget Wi-Fi!  Get ready for Gi-Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wi-Fi Networking News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wi-Fi Networking News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gi-Fi?&lt;/strong&gt;

Om Malik breaks the latest story: high up on the spectrum, it&#039;s gigabit wireless: While you can squeeze gigabits per second out of long-haul wireless using equipment from Proxim and a few others, short-range Wi-Fi-like gigabit networking is out of the ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gi-Fi?</strong></p>
<p>Om Malik breaks the latest story: high up on the spectrum, it&#8217;s gigabit wireless: While you can squeeze gigabits per second out of long-haul wireless using equipment from Proxim and a few others, short-range Wi-Fi-like gigabit networking is out of the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;2 &lt;i&gt;gigabit&lt;/i&gt; per second wireless networking&lt;/strong&gt;

Always on the case, Om Malik gets the scoop on a new wireless networking protocol called Gigabit to the Desktop, or GTTD, which operates around the 56GHz band of spectrum and should have a connection speed of at least 2 gigabits per second. He doesn&#039;t ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2 <i>gigabit</i> per second wireless networking</strong></p>
<p>Always on the case, Om Malik gets the scoop on a new wireless networking protocol called Gigabit to the Desktop, or GTTD, which operates around the 56GHz band of spectrum and should have a connection speed of at least 2 gigabits per second. He doesn&#8217;t &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eHomeUpgrade</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eHomeUpgrade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gigabit Speeds May Be Coming to Home Networks&lt;/strong&gt;

Looks like 2 Gigabits per second wireless home networking technologies are in the works. According to GigaOm, The FCC recently opened up the 56GHz spectrum and networking developers are pushing for standardization and improved wireless security over cu...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gigabit Speeds May Be Coming to Home Networks</strong></p>
<p>Looks like 2 Gigabits per second wireless home networking technologies are in the works. According to GigaOm, The FCC recently opened up the 56GHz spectrum and networking developers are pushing for standardization and improved wireless security over cu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodent Regatta</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodent Regatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Amazing&lt;/strong&gt;

Gizmodo points to Om Malik&#039;s discussion of a wireless technology that can deliver 2 gigabits per second to a desktop...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amazing</strong></p>
<p>Gizmodo points to Om Malik&#8217;s discussion of a wireless technology that can deliver 2 gigabits per second to a desktop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braintag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[braintag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;wireless gigabit.&lt;/strong&gt;

check this from gigaom: wireless gigabit. my future contains always on, always connected devices that receive everything as IP data packets. the only difference between my cell phone, my radio, and my tv is the software codec and the I/O...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>wireless gigabit.</strong></p>
<p>check this from gigaom: wireless gigabit. my future contains always on, always connected devices that receive everything as IP data packets. the only difference between my cell phone, my radio, and my tv is the software codec and the I/O&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muniwireless</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muniwireless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2003/11/30/forget-wi-fi-get-ready-for-gi-fi/#comment-96007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Two gigabit wireless around the corner?&lt;/strong&gt;

Think 54 megabits/second on 802.11g is just too slow? Well, according to Om Malik, wireless networks that deliver data at...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Two gigabit wireless around the corner?</strong></p>
<p>Think 54 megabits/second on 802.11g is just too slow? Well, according to Om Malik, wireless networks that deliver data at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

